Would you stay at a hotel that cost $36,000 per year? Would you rent a DVD for $600 per year? Sounds outrageous, right? Actually, those prices are just annualized rates for a $100/night hotel and a $5 DVD rental. You’d never stay in a hotel for a whole year and you wouldn’t keep a DVD rental for 365 days, so the annualized price doesn’t make sense.
Which brings us to the number one source of confusion and criticism about emergency cash loans — Annual Percentage Rate, also known as APR. Millions of Americans use emergency cash loans to make ends meet when an unexpected expense occurs. They typically borrow a few hundred dollars and pay it back over a few weeks. Emergency cash lenders might charge a fee of 10% to 20%, which is almost always less costly than other options such as bank overdraft protection and paying bills late. However, lenders are required to disclose the fee on an annualized basis, resulting in eye-popping APR’s of 300% or more (remember the $30,000 hotel room?).
Make no mistake about it, emergency cash loans are an expensive form of credit (that’s why they’re called *emergency* loans) but they meet a real need. The high APR’s associated with these loans have become a source of confusion for customers and a lightning rod for critics, which distracts from the real issue: Ensuring access to credit for those that need it most.
It’s important to note that we understand and respect the intent behind APR disclosures – our legislators and regulators want to protect consumers from making poor financial choices. But APR may not be the right way to do it.
Arjan Schutte, an investment manager that focuses on the needs of underbanked consumers, proposes a new way to measure the quality of short term credit products in his blog. It’s worth the read.